AI exposure, assessed and stated

One assessment.
Three statements.

The same ledger reads differently to a board, an employee, and a customer. We assess AI exposure once — and render it for all three.

Read a sample statement
Board · sample
Exposure statement
Exposure
M3.4
Positions
27
Priced options
4
PositionScore
Document reviewM4
Pricing deskM3
Client onboardingM2
The three statements

Same ledger, different reports.

Board / owners
Exposure statement

Scored M1–M5 like your DD products. Fiduciary cover — "we have assessed AI risk" is a governance expectation with the AI Act in force. Upside priced as options.

Employees
Role statement

The honest version: what changes, what doesn’t, which skills matter next. Most companies communicate nothing — the vacuum fills with LinkedIn doom.

Customers / suppliers
Position statement

How we use AI, what we don’t do with your data, why our service survives the shift. The ESG report of the 2020s.

Read the three statements in detail →

The M-scale

Exposure, scored like a diligence product.

The M1–M5 DNA is reused from due diligence: calibrated, comparable across portfolio companies, and defensible in front of an IC.

How the assessment works →

M1
Proofed
Service survives the shift as-is; moat holds.
M2
Resilient
Marginal exposure; efficiency upside dominates.
M3
Contested
Material positions exposed; options exist on both sides.
M4
Exposed
Core positions substitutable; window to act is open.
M5
Undefended
The moat is the thing being automated.
Governance

"We have assessed AI risk."

With the AI Act in force, that sentence is becoming a governance expectation. The exposure statement gives boards fiduciary cover — and once a few companies publish a position statement, their peers' silence becomes conspicuous.

Why now
CopenhagenEjendomsservice, 340 FTEPublished
StockholmSpecialty insurerPublished
HamburgMittelstand componentsDraft