Transactions · for buyers

Know what you are paying for.
Before the LOI.

Every target now claims to be AI-ready, and every diligence pack answers with narrative. A position ledger with M-scores gives your investment committee a number it can price.

The problem

The discount is already in your model. The evidence is not.

Buyers of software and services companies apply a silent discount for AI-replication risk — silently, because nobody can defend the number. An exposure assessment replaces it: which positions the target's earnings stand on, how substitutable each is, and what that does to the multiple.

Scores are calibrated and comparable across targets, sectors, and years. A shortlist scored on the same scale is a shortlist you can rank.

Position ledger
The target's earnings decomposed into scored positions — where the revenue actually stands.
M-scores
Each position and the aggregate on the M1–M5 scale, defensible in front of an IC.
Priced options
The upside a deliberate AI adoption would hold — priced, not narrated.
Evidence file
Every source logged, timestamped, and archived. Built to survive the seller's advisors.
No cooperation required

Works pre-LOI. Works on shortlists. Works quietly.

The assessment runs on public materials under a clean-room protocol — no source-code access, no data-room dependency, no signal to the seller. That means it fits where diligence normally cannot reach: before the LOI, across a shortlist, on a live deal where the target does not know.

Start with the one-week exposure screen. Escalate to a full replication assessment only where the screen says the risk is real.

Buy-side · sample
Exposure screen
Exposure
M4.1
Positions
18
Sources
117
PositionScore
Core productM4
Structured customer dataM1
Onboarding servicesM3
Would replication evidence have changed the price on your last deal?